Sexuality Wiki
Sexuality Wiki

Please use this page to discuss pages that have been labeled for deletion.

See Archive: Category talk:Candidates for deletion/Archive 1

Not a Sexuality

I don't a reason for this category. It's mostly used to make fun of sexualities. Miley Spears Discordian American Princess (let's talk) 20:34, July 13, 2020 (UTC)


I don't think this should be deleted, i reworked the page so it fit the actual definition of it. 13:50, July 22, 2020 (UTC)


I think this is most likely a troll page from the facts. 1. its name doesn't match it description. xeno- means "relating to a foreigner or foreigners" or "other; different in origin." but describes attraction to bisexual trans people. I.e. it is othering trans and/or bisexual people. I have no problem with xeno- being used for gender or sexuality but it shouldn't be referring to things that are in the LGBT mainsteam. A good example of a good useage is xenogender where it refers both to using other things to describe a person's gender and/or to the foreignness of using other things to describe a person's gender. 2. it uses transgender, not as an adjective. Which mostly done by transphobes and misinformed people. Miiohau (talk) 15:00, September 27, 2020 (UTC)

It's a real word so I think we can use it. Miley Spears Discordian American Princess (let's talk) 20:20, 7 March 2021 (UTC)


Clearly not a Sexuality. Deletion request is several months old. He's also married now.

Does not seem notable enough to keep. ElectroChip123 (talk) 04:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

This looks like a joke page which we don't have here as it says on our main page. Miley Spears Discordian American Princess (let's talk) 18:52, 25 March 2021 (UTC) The article was deleted.

Super Sexual

As is the article is very transphobic / a bit misleading, if kept it should be rewritten similar to this LGBTA article to better explain controversy and links to 4chan/TERFs.

Other similar pages like Super Straight, Supergay, Super Bisexual, Superbisexual, and Superlesbian should be removed as they don't have enough info to warrant their own page. -CovalenceSTU 23:58, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Supersexuality isn't transphobic. Not wanting to date, nor being attracted to trans doesn't equal being transphobic any more than straight is automatically homophobic, or homosexual is automatically heterophobic. The guilt by association argument claiming links to 4chan as if that was automatically "bad" isn't a good logical reason either, any more than the same guilt by association argument used by some religious fundamentalists who claim that homosexuals are paedophiles. I agree with the phrase “trans rights are human rights” but if the “human rights” you’re fighting for is the right to steamroll someone’s sexual boundaries, you’re pushing rape culture, and unfortunately some TRAs have been doing this a lot. Anyone who tries to tell you you must date X or you're Y is a rape apologist. This rape culture ethic is what supersexuality is fighting against. I'm against deletion. It would be wrong. It would further validate what the superstraights have been saying, they are being oppressed, they are being bullied, and they're sick and tired of this bullying just as much as they're sick of the rape culture ethic of too many trancels and TRAs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talkcontribs)

As stated above, Supersexuality is not inherently transphobic. While other groups like TERFs and 4chan may try to sabotage the movement or poison the message, small groups or individuals do not make up the face of the movement. Having a preference for a biologically male (XY) or female (XX) or any other sexes does not make the individual inherently an enemy of trans individuals in the slightest. You can readily find news articles about "far right" individuals using gay imagery or sponsoring pride parades, where the articles claim they are doing it out of mockery or to attack/harass a different group such as the Muslims, where while some claims are verified by these groups, others deny these accusations and genuinely support the community. By the logic of the TRAs, wouldn't this show homosexuals or the gay community as being against groups such as Muslims? That would make no sense. Of course there will be people who try to disturb the message, but those people should not be taken as the core of the Supers. Being a Super is by definition not a discrimination, it is a preference. As such, I believe this should not be deleted. To delete it would be to oppress the Superstraight community. Term Grecos (talk) 21:47, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Leather Fetish

The page is very lacking in content, and the creator even got the definition wrong. smh my head —Preceding unsigned comment added by SpaghettiMawn (talkcontribs)


Pronouns in my mind are more closely connected to gender and gender identity than sexual orientation or sexuality. So this page should go on either a general LGBT wiki like LGBT Info Wiki or a wiki on gender and gender identity like gender wiki. Miiohau (talk) 07:21, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

How do I add text properly?

Secondly, I feel that the page belongs here, as we talk about gender and stuff not related to sexuality. - SpaghettiMawn


Im sorry but that article is literally a made up sexuality that is basically fetishizing race / nationality